How to Streamline Contractor Safety Training

September 15, 2025

In high-risk industries, ensuring that every contractor is properly trained before they set foot on your site isn't just a best practice - it's a critical component of risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. But for many EHS and Operations leaders, managing this process is a manual, time-intensive headache that drains resources and creates unnecessary exposure.


At FIRST, VERIFY, we understand these challenges. Our platform is designed to transform this burden into a seamless, efficient, and auditable process. Today, we're taking a closer look at a powerful component of our service: the online safety orientation module.


The Pain of In-Person Safety Orientations


Think about your current process. Are you coordinating in-person training sessions for every new contractor? Are you struggling to track which contractor employee has completed the required training and which hasn't? Inconsistent standards, lost paperwork, and a lack of centralized documentation are major pain points. These inefficiencies not only waste valuable time for your safety professionals- they also put your company at risk of non-compliance and potential liability.


How FIRST, VERIFY’s Safety Orientation Module Solves Your Challenges


Our online safety orientation feature is a game-changer, providing a customized and user-friendly solution that ensures every contractor is prepared and documented. Here's how it works:


1. Customizable Training, Your Way:

We can host your existing safety orientation videos or even produce a video directly from your company's PowerPoint slides. This ensures that your specific site safety protocols are communicated clearly and consistently to every contractor, every time.


2. Verified Comprehension:

Our module goes beyond simple video viewing. We can integrate quizzes to test a contractor's comprehension, and the system can display which questions were answered incorrectly. For corporate policies, the system can enable an electronic acknowledgment form, giving you auditable proof that policies have been reviewed and accepted.


3. Automated & Accessible:

The system automatically emails reminders for renewal, ensuring that no contractor's training lapses. For your contractors, the process is simple: they can take the orientation online at their convenience. Once completed, a completion certificate is automatically generated for download and printing.


4. Centralized Records & Reporting:

All training records, including pass/fail results, are stored securely within each contractor's account. Your team can run aggregate reports by contractor, employee, or training course, giving you an immediate, high-level view of your compliance status.


5. Language Adaptability:

To ensure comprehension across a diverse workforce, the system offers professional voiceovers with Spanish and other language translations.


By implementing FIRST, VERIFY’s safety orientation module, you can eliminate the hassle of in-person classes and the time spent chasing paperwork. The result is a streamlined, cost-effective program that saves valuable time, reduces risk, and fosters a sustainably safe work environment for everyone.

Ready to simplify your contractor safety training?


Contact FIRST, VERIFY today to schedule a demo and learn how our solution can be tailored to your business needs.

You might also like

Hidden Costs of Manual Prequalification
August 21, 2025
Discover why manual contractor prequalification slows projects, increases risks, and drains resources. Learn how automation with FIRST, VERIFY improves safety,
Top 3OSHA v
August 8, 2025
Top 3 OSHA violations reveal deeper contractor risks. Discover how to shift from reactive penalties to proactive safety and compliance management.
A group of construction workers are standing next to each other on a construction site.
October 28, 2021
When a subcontractor is having trouble completing its subcontract work, it is not uncommon for a contractor to assert itself more directly into the completion process to help expedite the work. What’s the harm you might ask? A recent Loudoun County, Virginia case answered that question: It could lead to tortious interference with contract and conspiracy claims by the subcontractor. That case was Evans Construction Services (the subcontractor) versus Ox Builders (the contractor), and it also included a claim by the subcontractor against the contractor’s site superintendent, Lawler, as a co-defendant in the case individually. Evans alleged that Ox and Lawler tortuously interfered with Evan’s subcontracts by dealing directly with the subcontractors and directing the subcontractors’ work, cutting Evans out of the picture. Evans sought to recover its lost profits. Ox and Lawler argued against liability because Evans’ claims sought redress outside of Evans’ subcontracts with Ox and because Evans had no contract with Lawler at all, moving to dismiss Evans’ lawsuit as a matter of law. The court denied that motion, holding that the facts as pled by Evans were legally sufficient if ultimately proven by Evans, to support a claim for breach of legal duties separate from duties arising contractually only; and specifically for wrongful interference with Evans’ subcontracts and Evans’ related conspiracy claim against the defendants. Although the court acknowledged that Evans’ claims were interrelated with the Ox – Evans subcontracts underlying the parties’ relationship, those common facts could support both contractual and non-contractual breach claims in certain circumstances. The court further determined that such circumstances, if ultimately proven, included Evans’ claims that Ox and Lawler violated their independent common law duties to not interfere with Evans’ lower tier subcontracts and not conspire together to injure Evans in its business. The court, therefore, allowed Evans’ claims to proceed to trial on their merits. The defendants apparently did not argue to dismiss the conspiracy claim on the basis Lawler, as an employee of Ox, could not conspire with Ox, his employer (referred to as the intercorporate immunity doctrine), or at least that defense was not discussed in the court’s decision. But, regardless, this decision reflects the necessity for caution “going around” subcontractors when subcontract disputes arise. Author: Neil S.Lowenstein

Book a Service Today