How to Read a Certificate of Insurance
June 14, 2019
The numbers listed below correspond to blocks of information on the sample ACORD Certificate. Download the certificate by filling up the contact form at the bottom of the page.
- Date The date the certificate of Insurance was prepared.
- This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This statement expresses that the intent of the certificate is to show the certificate holder that the insured has purchased the insurance coverages listed on the certificate.
- Producer is the insurance broker that wrote the insurance policies for the insured party.
- Insured is the entity for whom the policy is written and is the primary insured. This entity is the party that has been requested to provide proof of coverage.
- Coverages This statement conveys that the listed insurance policies were issued to the insured and the coverage issued is subject to normal policy, terms, exclusions and conditions. Limits of coverage may be lower due to claims already paid out during the policy period.
- Type of Insurance Column This is the column where each type of liability coverage is listed. I.E General Liability, Automobile Liability, Excess Liability, etc.
- Claims- made and Occurrence There are two types of general liability coverage. Under a Claims Made policy coverage is provided for any occurrence taking place during the coverage period and the claim must also be made during the period of coverage. Occurrence coverage provides coverage for occurrences that take place during the period of coverage regardless of when the claim is made. Occurrence coverage is the desired coverage. Claims-made coverage is rarely used today.
- Companies Affording Coverage The companies providing the insurance coverage.
- Policy Number Column This is the column where each policy number should be listed.
- Policy Effective Date Column This is the column where each policy’s effective date is listed.
- Policy Expiration Date This column lists the date of each policy’s expiration.
- Limits Column The policy limits for each coverage is listed in this column.
- Special Descriptions description of site and or location codes and listing of additional insureds. This is where your company would be listed as an additional insured.
- Certificate Holder – Entity to which the certificate of coverage is listed. The certificate holder is not entitled to any rights of the insurance policies listed unless it is listed as an additional insured on the actual insurance policy.
- Cancellation Statement of the amount of time the insurance company will “endeavor” to provide the certificate holder on cancellation of the policies. This notice also states that the insurance company will not be liable if the notice isn’t given.
- Authorized Representative The individual at the insurance company or brokerage that is authorized to sign or issue the Certificate of Insurance.
Fill out Contact Form to Download Sample Accord Certificate
Fill out Contact Form to Download Sample Accord Certificate
You might also like

When a subcontractor is having trouble completing its subcontract work, it is not uncommon for a contractor to assert itself more directly into the completion process to help expedite the work. What’s the harm you might ask? A recent Loudoun County, Virginia case answered that question: It could lead to tortious interference with contract and conspiracy claims by the subcontractor. That case was Evans Construction Services (the subcontractor) versus Ox Builders (the contractor), and it also included a claim by the subcontractor against the contractor’s site superintendent, Lawler, as a co-defendant in the case individually. Evans alleged that Ox and Lawler tortuously interfered with Evan’s subcontracts by dealing directly with the subcontractors and directing the subcontractors’ work, cutting Evans out of the picture. Evans sought to recover its lost profits. Ox and Lawler argued against liability because Evans’ claims sought redress outside of Evans’ subcontracts with Ox and because Evans had no contract with Lawler at all, moving to dismiss Evans’ lawsuit as a matter of law. The court denied that motion, holding that the facts as pled by Evans were legally sufficient if ultimately proven by Evans, to support a claim for breach of legal duties separate from duties arising contractually only; and specifically for wrongful interference with Evans’ subcontracts and Evans’ related conspiracy claim against the defendants. Although the court acknowledged that Evans’ claims were interrelated with the Ox – Evans subcontracts underlying the parties’ relationship, those common facts could support both contractual and non-contractual breach claims in certain circumstances. The court further determined that such circumstances, if ultimately proven, included Evans’ claims that Ox and Lawler violated their independent common law duties to not interfere with Evans’ lower tier subcontracts and not conspire together to injure Evans in its business. The court, therefore, allowed Evans’ claims to proceed to trial on their merits. The defendants apparently did not argue to dismiss the conspiracy claim on the basis Lawler, as an employee of Ox, could not conspire with Ox, his employer (referred to as the intercorporate immunity doctrine), or at least that defense was not discussed in the court’s decision. But, regardless, this decision reflects the necessity for caution “going around” subcontractors when subcontract disputes arise. Author: Neil S.Lowenstein