OSHA Updates Non-Healthcare Employer Guidance on COVID-19 | FIRST, VERIFY

August 19, 2021

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) updated its COVID-19 guidance for non-healthcare employers, Protecting Workers: Guidance on Mitigating and Preventing the Spread of COVID-19 in the Workplace, on August 13, 2021.


While embracing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) updated recommendations for fully vaccinated people in areas of substantial or high transmission of COVID-19, OSHA also echoes the protocol President Joe Biden adopted for many federal employees and on-site employees of federal contractors and suggests that employers may want to “consider” adopting a policy requiring employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccination or submit to regular COVID-19 testing.


In July 2021, the CDC issued new recommendations that everyone, including fully vaccinated individuals, wear masks in indoor public settings in all areas experiencing substantial or high transmission of COVID-19. That CDC guidance also recommended that fully vaccinated individuals test for COVID-19 and mask after having close contact with an individual suspected or confirmed to have COVID-19. With respect to schools, the CDC recommended universal indoor masking for all teachers, staff, students and visitors to K-12 schools.


The CDC recommendations were precipitated by new evidence regarding the more transmissible Delta variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19. As explained by OSHA, “preliminary evidence suggests that fully vaccinated people who do become infected with the Delta variant can be infectious and can spread the virus to others.”


OSHA’s guidance now includes the following recommendations:


All workers, including fully vaccinated people, wear a face covering, as appropriate, in public indoor settings in areas of substantial or high transmission (unless their work requires a respirator or other personal protective equipment [PPE]);


Employers suggest or require all customers, visitors, or guests wear face coverings in public, indoor settings in areas of substantial or high transmission of COVID-19;

Employers consider adopting policies that require workers to get vaccinated or undergo regular COVID-19 testing — in addition to masking wearing and physical distancing — if they remain unvaccinated; and


Fully vaccinated workers who have a known exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 be tested three days to five days after exposure and wear a mask in public indoor settings for 14 days or until they receive a negative test result.


What This Means for Employers


The latest guidance expressly states that it is not a standard or regulation, and that it creates no new legal obligations. The recommendations are advisory in nature and intended to help employers recognize and eliminate hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm as part of their obligation to provide a safe and healthful workplace. The guidance makes clear that many healthcare settings are still covered by OSHA’s COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard. Employers should also remain cognizant of different requirements under state OSHA plans.


However, as employers reassess their COVID-19 workplace practices, they should keep in mind that during the Biden Administration, OSHA has more than tripled its use of the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act to cite employers for COVID-19 hazards not covered by an existing standard. Under the General Duty Clause, OSHA can cite an employer in the absence of a specific OSHA standard, such as those that govern respiratory protection, PPE, and sanitation. It will become even more important to keep abreast of industry best practices, especially related to industries at higher risk of spreading COVID-19, such as construction, manufacturing, agriculture, and meat and poultry processing. Considering OSHA’s new guidance, employers may need to review policies and procedures regarding any potential COVID-19 exposure to employees and consider developing an infectious disease plan.


OSHA continues to recommend that employers adopt a layered approach to minimizing the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace and summarizes the many protective measures employers may choose to use. Regardless of the measures employers choose to implement, their obligation to provide reasonable accommodations for religious, pregnancy-related, and medical reasons, absent undue hardship, continues. OSHA’s guidance notes that accommodation issues may arise with respect to face coverings (including respirators or other PPE) or vaccination requirements. Further, it states that certain medical conditions may put employees at higher risk of contracting COVID-19, by virtue of the condition itself or the inability to use face coverings or be vaccinated due to the condition. Such individuals may be entitled to other reasonable accommodations to protect them from contracting COVID-19.


Source: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/osha-updates-non-healthcare-employer-guidance-covid-19

You might also like

Multi-Site Contractor Verification for Safety Programs
March 10, 2026
Learn how consistent contractor verification across locations strengthens multi-site safety programs and improves contractor compliance oversight.
By Erica Montefusco March 4, 2026
EDITOR'S NOTE: Our friend Erica Montefusco , Senior VP, Risk & Compliance at PROtect, wrote the following post on LinkedIn. We liked it so much we asked if we could republish it as a guest blog. This is the first of four com-panion pieces on resilience and leadership, which will appear in future guest blogs. _______________ There is a misconception that industrial risk leadership is rigid. Regulations. Standards. Checklists. Audits. Metrics. On the surface, it can look procedural. But the longer I’ve worked in risk, safety, and compliance, the more I’ve realized something unexpected: This career is not about rigidity. It’s about exploration. Curiosity Is a Risk Control Before I worked in industrial environments, I was fascinated by anthropology, archaeology, and scientific dis-covery. Why civilizations rise. Why they collapse. How systems evolve. How small environmental or cultural shifts compound over time. That lens never left me. In industrial risk, the same principles apply. Organizations don’t experience catastrophic failure without signals. Drift occurs gradually. Norms shift quietly. Pressure normalizes shortcuts. If you’re not curious, you miss it. Curiosity is not abstract in this profession. It’s protective. Asking: Why is this procedure written this way? Why are near-miss reports declining? Why does this site feel different than others? Why did supervision behavior change under schedule pressure? Risk leadership requires scientific thinking - observation, hypothesis, pattern recognition. It is less about enforcement. More about investigation. Cultural Understanding Shapes Safety Culture Traveling the world, experiencing different countries, belief systems, and social norms, it reshaped how I view organizational culture. Every culture, whether national or corporate, has invisible rules. What is spoken openly. What is avoided. Who challenges authority. Who doesn’t. Safety culture operates the same way. You cannot implement risk controls without understanding cultural dynamics. If speaking up is culturally discouraged, Stop Work Authority will fail. If production pressure is celebrated as heroism, incidents will rise. If environmental stewardship is treated as compliance instead of responsibility, corners will eventually be cut. Leadership requires cultural literacy. And cultural literacy begins with humility. Exploration Builds Resilience Exploration, whether physical or intellectual, builds resilience. When you’ve navigated unfamiliar terrain, when you’ve faced environments outside your comfort zone, when you’ve experienced adversity and uncertainty… you learn something essential: Calm is a choice. In industrial risk leadership, calm is not optional. Emergencies happen. Incidents occur. Regulators ask hard questions. Executives look to you for clarity. Your tone becomes the baseline for everyone else. Resilience is not bravado. It’s steadiness under pressure. That steadiness is built long before crisis arrives. It is built through challenge. Scientific Curiosity and Regulatory Discipline Risk work is often viewed as regulatory. But at its core, it is scientific. Observe. Measure. Analyze. Adjust. Environmental compliance demands precision. Safety programs demand behavioral understanding. Risk mitigation demands systems thinking. The most effective leaders in this space are not just rule-followers. They are investigators. They want to understand: What is really happening? What patterns are emerging? What assumptions are we making? Where is drift occurring? Exploration and science share a common foundation: Intellectual honesty. If something isn’t working, you change it. If evidence contradicts belief, you adapt. That mindset has shaped how I lead. The Connection Between Stewardship and Leadership The longer I work in this field, the more I see risk leadership as stewardship. We are entrusted with: People’s safety. Community trust. Environmental integrity. Corporate reputation. Financial stability. That is not a small responsibility. Travel has taught me how interconnected systems are. Environmental work reinforces that daily. Air doesn’t stop at property lines. Water doesn’t respect ownership boundaries. Reputation doesn’t isolate itself to a single event. Leadership requires long-term thinking. Exploration teaches you to look beyond the immediate horizon. Why This Matters Now We are entering a period of increased transparency. AI-driven analytics. Real-time environmental monitoring. Data visibility at unprecedented levels. The future risk leader must be more than compliant. They must be: Curious. Culturally aware. Scientifically grounded. Emotionally steady. Ethically anchored. Industrial leadership and exploration are not opposites. They are parallel disciplines. Both require courage. Both require humility. Both require adaptability. Both require respect for forces larger than yourself. And both demand resilience. Closing Reflection If there is one thing my professional career and personal philosophy share, it is this: Never accept the surface. Look deeper. Ask harder questions. Challenge assumptions. Stay steady under pressure. Protect what matters. Risk leadership, like exploration, is not about control. It is about understanding. And understanding is what ultimately keeps people safe.
Centralized Contractor Data
March 4, 2026
Learn how centralized contractor data, automated COI tracking, and structured contractor prequalification reduce administrative burden while strengthening safety...

Book a Service Today