Do You Believe in Safety?

June 14, 2019

Elaine Taylor recalls back in the mid 1990s when one of her employees – a young carpenter – was wrapping up work at the end of the day replacing the roof on a fire-damaged home. It was winter time in Alaska, and the crew had just finished spreading plastic sheets to cover the roof openings. One feature of plastic is its low co-efficient of friction, especially when icy and laying at a 23° angle. One feature of young carpenters is an attitude of haste, another is of invincibility. Unfortunately, he lost his footing and in less than two seconds, he had fallen 21/2 stories – over 30 feet – hitting the frozen ground at around 32 mph without wearing any fall protection equipment.

Fortunately his landing was cushioned by snow, otherwise he might have died. Nonetheless, he broke his lower back and never again returned to work as a carpenter. He was off of work for a year and had to get training to work in another industry. “It changed his life forever,” Taylor said wistfully.

The companyTaylor owns with her husband Larry and their childrenTrent and Lisa –Taylored Restoration, in Anchorage – had been technically compliant with AKOSH regulations. They had their safety meetings, they had a safety program, but they didn’t follow up in a systematic fashion to ensure that employees were implementing the procedures. “We talked the talk, but didn’t walk the walk,”Taylor says. “It wasn’t really key to our beliefs.”

Before the accident, AKOSH would inspect their commercial work, but after the accident they became a larger dot on AKOSH’s radar. It didn’t help when they filed the accident report late (the federal OSHA standard is less strict, requiring notification at three hospitalizations). The job site was a long way from the hospital, and they arrived so late they decided to wait until the next day to file, not realizing that their delay placed them in violation of AKOSH’s 24-hr. notice rule. That highlighted the need for better education in the
applicable OSHA regulations.

Fortunately, they didn’t incur any legal liability, but they paid a fine to AKOSH, and, of course, their EMR went up causing their worker’s compensation premiums to increase significantly. While the economic consequences were meaningful, the greater impact on the Taylors was the sobering human cost paid by their carpenter. At a subsequent meeting of the company leadership team, Taylor interrupted the discussion and declared, “We’re approaching this the wrong way. We need to look at safety as the first thing we think about. ”That initiated a fundamental change in the company’s operating procedures and culture.

Now, every employee has the authority to stop any activity they think is unsafe. If a worker has an accident, it’s addressed at the next company meeting and the employees discuss how it could have been avoided. Their safety policy is enforced rigorously in the field, resulting in actually firing some employees who had refused to comply and tie off. The company also works closely with their worker’s compensation carrier to ensure that their safety program is up to date.

Their subcontractors have to walk the line right along with them. On one project, an employee stopped other employees working for a subcontractor and kicked them off the job. On another project at an apartment complex, an employee spoke up during a job site meeting and insisted that a sub working for the apartment manager be tied off or Taylored would stop work. The apartment manager agreed and required the worker to wear his fall protection equipment. When a sub actually did fall off the roof, when he reached the limit of the line he swung back under the eave and into a tempered glass window. The impact left an imprint of his body on the glass, most likely damaging his pride but not his health.

Every new Taylored Restoration employee must now go through a formal safety orientation and is not allowed on a job until after watching a few key videos.There’s a company safety committee with oversight responsibility for the various departments—cleaning, office staff, large jobs, small jobs and so on.They are charged with continuous revisions to the safety manual and MSDSs, and with keeping employees’ safety awareness at top of mind. Safety presentations are run by different departments in rotation at the company wide monthly meetings. Creativity is encouraged, if not required—departmental employees produce skits, videos, and exercises to convey their lessons in new and memorable ways. One exercise pits workers in a relay race to help get them more familiar with tying off their fall protection equipment.

There’s no central database for residential construction, like Dodge Reports, from which OSHA can develop programmed inspection lists, leaving it to the off chance of a drive-by to initiate any scrutiny.This means that compliance in restoration isn’t driven by being closely watched, but instead by company culture. So if a contractor’s owners don’t have a genuine commitment to safety, the risk of serious injury or death can be too high.

Read Next - Can a good safety program actually reduce costs?

You might also like

By Erica Montefusco March 4, 2026
EDITOR'S NOTE: Our friend Erica Montefusco , Senior VP, Risk & Compliance at PROtect, wrote the following post on LinkedIn. We liked it so much we asked if we could republish it as a guest blog. This is the first of four com-panion pieces on resilience and leadership, which will appear in future guest blogs. _______________ There is a misconception that industrial risk leadership is rigid. Regulations. Standards. Checklists. Audits. Metrics. On the surface, it can look procedural. But the longer I’ve worked in risk, safety, and compliance, the more I’ve realized something unexpected: This career is not about rigidity. It’s about exploration. Curiosity Is a Risk Control Before I worked in industrial environments, I was fascinated by anthropology, archaeology, and scientific dis-covery. Why civilizations rise. Why they collapse. How systems evolve. How small environmental or cultural shifts compound over time. That lens never left me. In industrial risk, the same principles apply. Organizations don’t experience catastrophic failure without signals. Drift occurs gradually. Norms shift quietly. Pressure normalizes shortcuts. If you’re not curious, you miss it. Curiosity is not abstract in this profession. It’s protective. Asking: Why is this procedure written this way? Why are near-miss reports declining? Why does this site feel different than others? Why did supervision behavior change under schedule pressure? Risk leadership requires scientific thinking - observation, hypothesis, pattern recognition. It is less about enforcement. More about investigation. Cultural Understanding Shapes Safety Culture Traveling the world, experiencing different countries, belief systems, and social norms, it reshaped how I view organizational culture. Every culture, whether national or corporate, has invisible rules. What is spoken openly. What is avoided. Who challenges authority. Who doesn’t. Safety culture operates the same way. You cannot implement risk controls without understanding cultural dynamics. If speaking up is culturally discouraged, Stop Work Authority will fail. If production pressure is celebrated as heroism, incidents will rise. If environmental stewardship is treated as compliance instead of responsibility, corners will eventually be cut. Leadership requires cultural literacy. And cultural literacy begins with humility. Exploration Builds Resilience Exploration, whether physical or intellectual, builds resilience. When you’ve navigated unfamiliar terrain, when you’ve faced environments outside your comfort zone, when you’ve experienced adversity and uncertainty… you learn something essential: Calm is a choice. In industrial risk leadership, calm is not optional. Emergencies happen. Incidents occur. Regulators ask hard questions. Executives look to you for clarity. Your tone becomes the baseline for everyone else. Resilience is not bravado. It’s steadiness under pressure. That steadiness is built long before crisis arrives. It is built through challenge. Scientific Curiosity and Regulatory Discipline Risk work is often viewed as regulatory. But at its core, it is scientific. Observe. Measure. Analyze. Adjust. Environmental compliance demands precision. Safety programs demand behavioral understanding. Risk mitigation demands systems thinking. The most effective leaders in this space are not just rule-followers. They are investigators. They want to understand: What is really happening? What patterns are emerging? What assumptions are we making? Where is drift occurring? Exploration and science share a common foundation: Intellectual honesty. If something isn’t working, you change it. If evidence contradicts belief, you adapt. That mindset has shaped how I lead. The Connection Between Stewardship and Leadership The longer I work in this field, the more I see risk leadership as stewardship. We are entrusted with: People’s safety. Community trust. Environmental integrity. Corporate reputation. Financial stability. That is not a small responsibility. Travel has taught me how interconnected systems are. Environmental work reinforces that daily. Air doesn’t stop at property lines. Water doesn’t respect ownership boundaries. Reputation doesn’t isolate itself to a single event. Leadership requires long-term thinking. Exploration teaches you to look beyond the immediate horizon. Why This Matters Now We are entering a period of increased transparency. AI-driven analytics. Real-time environmental monitoring. Data visibility at unprecedented levels. The future risk leader must be more than compliant. They must be: Curious. Culturally aware. Scientifically grounded. Emotionally steady. Ethically anchored. Industrial leadership and exploration are not opposites. They are parallel disciplines. Both require courage. Both require humility. Both require adaptability. Both require respect for forces larger than yourself. And both demand resilience. Closing Reflection If there is one thing my professional career and personal philosophy share, it is this: Never accept the surface. Look deeper. Ask harder questions. Challenge assumptions. Stay steady under pressure. Protect what matters. Risk leadership, like exploration, is not about control. It is about understanding. And understanding is what ultimately keeps people safe.
Centralized Contractor Data
March 4, 2026
Learn how centralized contractor data, automated COI tracking, and structured contractor prequalification reduce administrative burden while strengthening safety...
Contractor Training Verification & Compliance
February 24, 2026
Learn why contractor training verification and proper documentation reduce risk, improve OSHA compliance, and protect your organization.

Book a Service Today